The most interesting revision to me was that Whitman strikes:
118 Thruster holding me tight, and that I hold tight! |
We
hurt each other as the bridegroom and the bride
hurt
each other.
|
from
the blue book and it doesn't remain in the 1867 version. I remember
reading that the first time through and thinking, “Whoa, that
causes a pause in 2012 never mind in the mid 1800s.” I wonder why
he decided to take it out. Maybe he thought it was crossing the line,
though I doubt it considering all of the other sexual references
presented in the work.
The other revision that stood out to me was the addition of "O, speech" to one of my favorite lines, "Do you not know, O speech, how the buds beneath you are folded?" This really clarifies the metaphor and it makes the meaning much more powerful.
The other revision that stood out to me was the addition of "O, speech" to one of my favorite lines, "Do you not know, O speech, how the buds beneath you are folded?" This really clarifies the metaphor and it makes the meaning much more powerful.
Other than some sporadic changes like
these two, in which I can't speak to Whitman's motivation of why he
cut these lines or not, the only pattern I noticed in this revision
is that of taking the “e” out of past tense verbs so that they
only have the “ 'd” remaining. He also changes some words that
normally would be capitalized and makes them lowercase. I am not sure
why he does this. The first thing that comes to mind is that he wants
it to sound more colloquial, more like the common man and as for
striking down the uppercase letters: Maybe he is getting rid of
hierarchy in the written word to match his belief put forth in “Song
of Myself” that everyone is as good or bad as everyone else.
Equality everywhere, even for proper nouns! Don't think you're so
important!
Personal pet-peeve: Why doesn't every
edition of Leaves of Grass
have line numbering? (I am looking at the two editions I have,
the original 1855 edition and the “Death-Bed” edition.) That
would make everyone's life a lot easier for comparing since Whitman
seems a bit OCD in changing his work over and over and over again.
There is something to be said for over-revision. Maybe a poem
shouldn't be treated like a series of new software releases.
I think that despite completely
chopping certain sections, for the most part Whitman makes minor
revisions; punctuation changes and the small detail changes mentioned
above. The feel of “Song of Myself” remains the same. The
heart of the poem, what it intends to do, works equally as well in
all of these editions.
Yes . .that "thruster" must evidently go. But still I wonder why? As for line numbers . . . the 1855 edition lacked them . . . but a good question is: when did line numbers get added to Leaves? and when did line numbers become a standard feature of poetry?
ReplyDelete